Thursday, October 27, 2011

Orang Melayu perlu bersatu semula. Apakah dasarnya?

Orang Melayu perlu bersatu semula

KUALA LUMPUR 26 Okt. – Bekas Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor mengingatkan orang Melayu supaya kembali bersatu untuk memastikan keselamatan negara sentiasa terjamin.

Katanya, penyatuan orang Melayu bukan sahaja menjamin keselamatan negara, malah ia juga akan memberi rahmat kepada kaum lain yang hidup bersama di negara ini.

“Orang Melayu perlu bersatu seperti mana ketika 1946 dahulu semasa membantah usaha untuk menubuhkan Malayan Union. Malah, kesatuan serta kesepakatan orang Melayu ketika itu juga yang menyebabkan ideologi pengganas komunis gagal meresap di negara ini.

“Ia (bersatu) merupakan asas kepada keamanan yang kita kecapi sepanjang 54 tahun negara merdeka. Kita sebagai rakyat dapat hidup dengan aman walaupun terdapat perbezaan bangsa serta agama, pembangunan negara turut berjalan lancar kerana keamanan ini.

“Jadi bersatulah. Hanya dengan bersatu, keselamatan kita akan terjamin dan negara sentiasa aman makmur,” katanya ketika menyampaikan ucapan perasmian Persidangan Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) Kedua di sini, hari ini…

Ulasan: Lupakan bersatu hanya atas dasar bangsa kerana akan berpecah lagi seperti sekarang. Bersatu kita cuma di atas nama agama Islam.

Yakin transformasi kerajaan?

Yakin transformasi kerajaan

KUALA LUMPUR 26 Okt. - Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak menyeru seluruh masyarakat India supaya terus menaruh keyakinan dan kepercayaan kepada kerajaan kerana transformasi yang dilaksanakan demi kesejahteraan rakyat.

Perdana Menteri berkata, sempena sambutan Deepavali, sokongan dan keyakinan masyarakat India terhadap transformasi kerajaan akan menjadi ‘cahaya mengatasi kegelapan’ kepada kaum tersebut, sama seperti maksud Deepavali.

Ulasan: Beberapa janji kepada rakyat sebelum menjadi pembangkang selepas PRU13 nanti. Marilah kita bertukar rasa dengan memilih kerajaan baru yang TIDAK ADA rekod mencuri wang rakyat. Kalau tak percaya, tanyalah SPRM.

Mohamed Bouazizi: memories of a Tunisian martyr

Mohamed Bouazizi has become a hero in Tunisia ever since he doused himself in petrol and set himself alight in December, triggering protests which ultimately led to the downfall of President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali. 

He sold fruit and vegetables without a permit because he was unable to get a formal job.

Mr Bouazizi, 26, later died from his injuries. His younger sister Samia told the BBC World Service what her brother was going through before his death and how he inspired Tunisia.

"Mohamed was in trouble because agents from the council were asking for bribes every time he was buying and selling his vegetables. 

On the day he set himself on fire he went to sell his vegetables as usual.

An agent from the council asked for bribes and again he refused so they took his vegetables, fruit, took his goods and put them in the car. One of them asked for the scales and Mohamed refused. 

At that point one of the agents smacked him and beat him in the face. The other three agents also started beating him. 

Mohamed was crying, screaming and pleading with them but they wouldn't stop. 

After that he went to the town hall and asked for his goods and scales to be returned. But they refused so he went to the main government and again asked for his goods to be returned to him.
'Only solution'

Mohamed asked to see the governor but the police prevented him from entering the building. Again he pleaded, cried and screamed but still they refused. 

All the doors closed before him. He was crying and crying but nobody was helping. So for him the only solution he saw was death.

He then just went away, bought a bottle of petrol and did this act. 

Shortly after, my neighbour came to see me to tell me Mohamed had set himself on fire and he was badly burnt.

It was a terrible shock for us and we're all suffering and crying since Mohamed died. The loss is very difficult for all of us because we are all unemployed. Nobody is helping us. 

No member of our family could believe he was dead, it was a big, big surprise. 

But it was also a surprise to see all these people with Mohamed's big picture taking to the streets and shouting his name and crying. There were many people in the centre of Sidi Bouzid. It was a huge movement. 

Before in Tunisia there wasn't any justice or solidarity, fraternity but now owing to Mohamed all young people can talk freely."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12241082

Ulasan: Rakyatnya berjiwa merdeka. Tapi tak perlu membunuh diri. Bila rakyat bangun hilanglah pemimpin yang korup.

Turkey says won't change its position on Israel despite aid

27 October 2011, Thursday / TODAYSZAMAN.COM , 

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu has said Turkey will not change its what he termed "a principled position" with respect to Israel because of its aid it sent to help cope with earthquake that wrecked life havoc in eastern Turkey, stressing that Ankara's political conditions for reconciliation remain intact.

Davutoğlu is the latest Turkish official to claim that intense political climate both Israel and Turkey are going through does not affect both countries' determination to help each other on humanitarian grounds. While speaking to a news conference with his Jordanian counterpart, Davutoğlu dismissed claims that Turkey initially rejected international offers for aid and said Turkey has never considered the aid offers with "[political] prejudice." 

Turkey asked dozens of countries on Monday, including Israel, who previously told Ankara were ready to send aid for earthquake victims and international aid have started pouring in since then. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak instructed the military send aid to Turkey as requested. The Israeli aid plane was scheduled to land in Ankara on Wednesday afternoon. 

Earthquake in eastern Turkey also presented a window of opportunity for Turkish and Israeli leaders to bury hostilities as leaders of both countries had phone conversations after a long hiatus. Turkish President Abdullah Gül and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan spoke on phone with their Israeli counterparts, Shimon Peres and Benjamin Netanyahu. 

But Davutoğlu rejected any reconciliation between Turkey and Israel and said aid by the Jewish state will not translate into change into Ankara's position regarding Israel. "Political conditions remain," Davutoğlu said, referring to Turkey's demands for restoring ties…

Comment: Your carrots will not tie our hands. Turkey is now a principled nation.

Turkey FM: Assad following path Gaddafi once walked

26 October 2011, Wednesday / TODAY'S ZAMAN, ANKARA 

Turkey regrets seeing Syria following the same chaotic process that Libya went through, but Bashar al-Assad is brushing off friendly advice to step down, just like Muammar Gaddafi did when Turkey told him that Libyan unrest would bring about his demise, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu told Turkish media over the last two days as he proceeded from a visit to Serbia to the Middle East.
 
“Our prime minister [Recep Tayyip Erdoğan] was telling Gaddafi the same things he is telling Assad today; but I am afraid Syria is moving toward a similar period [as Libya],” Davutoğlu told the Star daily in an interview the paper published on Wednesday. Noting that Turkey had informed Gaddafi of what could and would eventually happen after he lost his grip over protests in Libya, Davutoğlu expressed his sorrow over the brutal killing of Gaddafi by his own people, as he dubbed what he saw in the footage of his death as “scenes that hurt our conscience.”

According to Davutoğlu, Turkey has tried hard to prevent a clash similar to what happened in Libya over the last few months from being repeated in Syria, but the calls have gone unanswered. “He [Erdoğan] told Assad to hold elections, and let the Syrian nation decide on the future of the country, but Assad does not listen, just like Gaddafi did not,” Davutoğlu was quoted as saying by Star.

The remarks from the foreign minister were the most recent from Turkey on Syria after a long break of contact with that country, as Turkish officials in the past repeatedly called on Assad to backpedal and go for democratic reforms and elections, but sharply cut down on efforts when Assad made clear he would not heed advice from other countries. “The process does not play out well for leaders who do not receive their power from their nation; once they lose political power, it is either jail or a grave that they end up in,” Davutoğlu commented in harsh words that noted how critical Turkey perceived the condition of leaders of the Arab Spring who resist change and the will of their people…

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-261029-davutoglu-assad-following-path-gaddafi-once-walked.html

Umno terdesak, guna 3R tarik sokongan Melayu

Khairil Abdul Rahim

TEMERLOH, 27 Oktober: Umno sedang cuba menggunakan strategi “3R” iaitu racial (perkauman), religion (agama) dan royal (raja ) bagi memenangi undi pilihan raya, kata Timbalan Presiden PAS Haji Mohamad Sabu.

Beliau mendedahkan, serangan politik sedemikian digunakan setelah parti itu merasakan sukar dan tidak yakin untuk mendapatkan undi bukan Melayu dan bandar seperti keputusan Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) 2008.

“Dalam keadaan politik sekarang untuk memenangi pilihan raya Umno mengharapkan empat komponen iaitu undi Melayu luar bandar, undi peneroka Felda, undi pos dan undi daripada Sabah serta Sarawak.

“Untuk itu strategi mereka mempermainkan isu-isu bersifat 3R iaitu racial (perkauman), religion (agama) dan royal (raja). Manakala negeri utama sasaran mereka ialah Selangor, Pulau Pinang dan Perak,” katanya.

Mohamad berkata demikian ketika berucap di hadapan lebih 3,000 pendengar sempena Sambutan 60 Tahun PAS Peringkat Negeri Pahang, di Tapak Kompleks PAS, Kerdau di sini malam tadi….

Ulasan: Apakah di harapkan lagi kepada UMNO yang dianggap Tun Dr Mahathir sebagai  “Umno busuk hingga ke ususnya.”? Dan “Umno busuk daripada peringkat terendah hingga ke peringkat tertinggi.”

Jadikan laporan audit KPI tolak BN

Harakahdaily  

KUALA LUMPUR, 26 Okt: Dewan Pemuda PAS menggesa rakyat di negara ini menjadikan Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010 sebagai Indeks Prestasi Utama (KPI) untuk menilai kecekapan dan keberkesanan pentadbiran kerajaan Barisan Nasional.

Timbalan Ketua, Dewan Pemuda PAS Wilayah Persekutuan, Mohamad Suhaimi Abdul Aziz berkata, daripada Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010, didapati terdapat banyak kelemahan, kepincangan, ketirisan serta kepincangan dalam projek-projek pelbagai kementerian serta agensi kerajaan.  

"Di sebalik pembentangan Bajet ‘gula-gula’ pilihan raya 2012, yang dianggap ramai sebagai bajet rakyat kerana banyak peruntukan 'one off' untuk rakyat, Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010 menceritakan segala-galanya. 

"Tidak hairanlah, Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010 gagal dibentangkan pada masa yang ditetapkan iaitu semasa Bajet 2011 tempo hari," katanya dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.

Beliau merujuk kepada laporan bahawa RM 160.7 juta yang telah diululuskan oleh Kementerian Pelajaran untuk membina 300 makmal komputer, namun hanya 2 buah makmal sahaja yang siap sementara peralatan ICT yang dibekalkan sejak 3 tahun lepas masih belum dapat digunakan.

Kementerian Sumber Asli dan alam Sekitar pula mencatatkan pembelian barangan yang jauh lebih mahal dari harga sebenar. 

Antaranya komputer riba dan pencetak dibeli dengan harga RM 11,845 berbanding pasaran RM3,428 iaitu 246% lebih mahal, LCD TV dan DVD Player dengan RM 16,100 berbanding pasaran RM 2,182 iaitu 638% lebih mahal, Radar X-Band dengan RM 47,725 berbanding pasaran RM 8,255 iaitu 478% lebih mahal, Bushnell Binocular dengan RM 56,350 berbanding pasaran RM 2,827, 1893% lebih mahal, Marine Binocular dengan RM 56,350 berbanding pasaran RM 1,940, 2805 % lebih mahal, Walkie-Talkie dengan RM 4,324 berbanding pasaran RM,1561, 177% lebih mahal.

Majlis Sukan Negara pula mencatat pembelian boros dengan membeli 23 ekor kuda baka khas untuk sebuah pertandingan dengan harga RM 5.66 juta. 

Pembelian ini dibuat secara runding terus tanpa mendapat kelulusan dari Kementerian Kewangan. 

Namun, 18 ekor darinya tidak melepasi piawaian Federation Equestre International, hanya lima ekor sahaja lulus untuk menyertai pertandingan.

Kementerian Pertanian dan Industri Asas Tani pula mencatat pengurusan yang tidak telus dan tidak efektif kerana tidak membayar RM 110.67 juta insentif kepada 73 291 orang petani. 

Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi pula gagal mengurus secara efektif kerana peralatan yang berjumlah RM 64.69 juta masih terbiar dan tidak dapat digunakan sehingga kini. 

Akibat itu, sejumlah RM 0.44 juta lagi dibazirkan untuk kawal selia dan insurans bagi menyimpan peralatan tersebut.

Selain itu, terdapat 8 Syarikat GLC yang mengalami penurunan pendapatan selama tiga tahun berturut-turut. Malah, ada syarikat GLC yang mengalami kerugian seperti Syarikat Prasarana Negara, Kertapi Tanah Melayu, Assest Global Network dan Indah Water Konsortium. Jumlah kerugian keseluruhan ialah RM 630.45 Juta.

Mengulas lanjut, Suhaimi berkata kesemua fakta yang diberikan hanya sebahagian daripada keseluruhan kelemahan dan kepincangan kerajaan dan ternyata saban tahun negara ditadbir oleh pemimpin yang tidak cekap, tidak amanah, efisyen dan konsisten. 

"Amalan boros, membazir sudah seakan sebati dalam diri pemimpin negara hari ini. Harta rakyat seumpama harta ‘mak bapak’ mereka yang boleh diagih sesuka hati mereka.

"Cukuplah negara ditadbir oleh mereka yang kurang berkemampuan, dan berikan ruang pula buat Pakatan Rakyat mentadbir negara," tegasnya.

Ulasan: Rakyat mempunyai banyak sebab untuk menolak BN/UMNO yang tidak cekap, tidak amanah, tidak efisyen dan tidak konsisten dalam PRU yang terdekat.


Audit: Bukti Umno BN gagal urus wang negara

Harakahdaily  

KUALA LUMPUR, 26 Okt: Jabatan Pilihan raya Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia menyokong penuh kenyataan Ketua Penerangan PAS Pusat, Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man berhubung isu kelemahan pengurusan kewangan kerajaan adalah disebabkan oleh kerakusan Umno BN memerintah negara dengan secara boros, tidak berhemah dan berlaku penyelewengan kuasa yang serius sehingga menyebabkan kehilangan wang kerajaan.

“Kelemahan ini telah ditegur oleh Ketua Audit Negara, Tan Sri Ambrin Buang di dalam Laporan Ketua Audit Negara bagi tahun 2010,” kata pengarahnya, Mohd Sany Hamzan.

Katanya, Jabatan Pilihan raya Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia melihat kerajaan selama ini sememangnya tidak pernah mengambil peduli terhadap perjalanan sistem pengurusan kewangan yang berhemah dan telus.

Ini, katanya kerana budaya kerja Umno BN telah membarah dengan budaya rasuah, kronisme dan nepotisme walaupun telah ditegur oleh Ketua Audit Negara tahun-tahun sebelum ini.

Selain itu, ujarnya disebabkan kelemahan pengurusan kewangan Kerajaan Pusat juga memberi kesan terhadap syarikat-syarikat yang dikawal oleh Kementerian Kewangan yang mana 19 daripada 47 syarikat mengalami kerugian pada tahun 2009.

Jumlah kerugian bernilai RM0.71 billion iaitu penurunan RM3.83 billion berbanding keuntungan sebelum cukai sebanyak RM96.18 billion pada tahun 2008.

Oleh itu, tambah beliau Jabatan Pilihan raya Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia menasihatkan rakyat Malaysia keseluruhannya supaya menolak Umno BN di dalam pilihan raya umum yang akan datang kerana Umno BN terbukti gagal di dalam mengurus kewangan negara, mengamalkan rasuah dan menyalahgunakan dana kerajaan untuk kepentingan peribadi dan kroni.

“Tolak BN untuk selamatkan Malaysia,” serunya.

Ulasan: Rakyat kini ada bukti kukuh untuk menolak BN/UMNO untuk selamatkan negara kita.

Hudud: Biar Kelantan jadi makmal

Muhammad Faizal  

SHAH ALAM, 26 Okt: Exco Pembangunan Islam, Pendidikan dan Dakwah Negeri Kelantan, Datuk Mohd Amar Abdullah berkata, Kelantan harus menjadi makmal kepada perlaksanaan undang-undang syariah tersebut.

Jika perlaksanaannya gagal, maka kerajaan negeri katanya akur dengan keputusan itu manakala jika berjaya maka tidak ada alasan perlaksanaannya ditolak di Malaysia.

"Kita berharap Kelantan akan menjadi makmal kepada perlaksanaan Hudud dan jika ia gagal maka kita menerimanya jika perlaksanaan itu berjaya maka tidak akan ada alasan untuk ia ditolak dari perlaksanaannya di Malaysia," katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian dalam Wacana anjuran SInar Harian bertajuk "Hudud Dilema dan Perlaksanaan" di sini semalam.

Tambahnya lagi, tujuan Kelantan ingin melaksanakan hudud adalah kerana hendak menghapuskan gejala sosial dan jenayah yang ada sekarang kerana ia dilihat mampu mengurangan gejala tersebut.

"Pada masa sekarang undang-undang biasa di negara ini tidak dapat mengatasi sepenuhnya gejala jenayah dan sosial yang berlaku yang mana setiap hari sentiasa ada kes ragut, pembuangan bayi dan juga rompakkan dilaporkan.

"Bagi saya setiap apa yang di maksudkan di dalam al-Quran tentang hudud saya yakin masalah ini dapat kita selesaikan kerana hudud akan memberi kesan kepada mereka yang melakukan kesalahan," jelasnya lagi...

Ulasan: Kenapa orang Islam dinafikan hak untuk amalkan agamanya?


Cegah murtad: Mantapkan aqidah, bukan himpunan

Harakahdaily  

KUALA LUMPUR, 27 Okt: PAS secara konsisten berpendirian bahawa kedah mencegah murtad adalah dengan cara memantapkan aqidah umat Islam itu sendiri seperti konsep yang ditunjukkan oleh al-quran dan Rasulullah S.A.W.

Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang berkata, pendekatan hujah dengan ilmu dan perlaksanaan syariat yang tegas dan adil serta menghukum penganut Islam dan menyampaikan dakwah kepada pihak lain tanpa paksaan adalah kaedah lebih lunak mencegah gejala tersebut.

"PAS memilih uslub menyampaikan mesej Islam dengan konsep yang ditunjukkan oleh Al Quran dan Rasulullah S.A.W. dengan cara memantapkan aqidah umat Islam sendiri secara istiqamah yang menghalang murtad dengan ilmu dan syariat yang tegas dan adil, menghukum penganut Islam, dan menyampaikan dakwah kepada pihak lain tanpa paksaan dengan uslub hiwar antara agama dan tamadun, serta berhujah dengan ilmu dan amal Islam yang adil dan sempurna," katanya dalam satu kenyataan kepada Harakahdaily.

Beliau berkata demikian dipercayai sebagai mengulas pendekatan pihak tertentu yang menganjurkan Himpunan Sejuta Umat (Himpun) baru-baru ini bagi membantah usaha kristianisasi umat Islam.

Bagi PAS, kata Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi, pendekatan berhimpun tersebut ibarat "cuba menangkap segelintir pencuri yang ada bersama dalam himpunan tersebut".

Selain itu beliau mempersoal, jika perhimpunan itu satu bantahan, kepada siapa ianya dituju, dan apakah kesannya.

"Satu himpunan besar dikerah bagi menangani gejala murtad yang berlaku dalam masyarakat Islam di Malaysia. Kepada siapa ditujukan sekiranya ia adalah bantahan? Apakah pendekatan dan uslub yang akan diambil?," soalnya.

"PAS tidak bersedia bangkit laksana keluar beramai-ramai untuk menangkap hanya segelintir pencuri yang berjaya melepaskan diri, dengan cara pencuri berada sama dikalangan orang ramai yang memburunya, sama-sama meneriakkan : Pencuri! Pencuri! Akhirnya pencuri hilang bersama suara laungan yang berkumandang," katanya lagi.

22 Oktober lalu, beberapa NGO Islam mengadakan Perhimpunan Sejuta Umat (Himpun) di Stadium Shah Alam atas menyelamatkan aqidah umat Islam…

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Kelemahan 7 kementerian, agensi tidak akan berulang

PUTRAJAYA 25 Okt. — Kelemahan pengurusan kewangan tujuh kementerian dan agensi kerajaan, akan dipastikan tidak berulang, kata Ketua Setiausaha Negara, Tan Sri Mohd. Sidek Hassan.

Beliau berkata, langkah-langkah penambahbaikan akan terus diperhebatkan untuk menjamin segala peruntukan yang diberi diurustabdir dengan berkesan.

"Saya tidak risau sangat bila Ketua Audit (Negara) beri pandangan sedemikian, saya risau jika masalah itu ada, tetapi Ketua Audit (Negara) tidak mahu beri pandangan,” katanya kepada pemberita di sini hari ini.

Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010 semalam menyebut tujuh kementerian dan agensi kerajaan berada pada tahap pengurusan kewangan lemah.

Tujuh kementerian dan agensi itu ialah Kementerian Kesihatan; Kementerian Tenaga, Teknologi Hijau dan Air; Kementerian Pengangkutan; Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri; Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia; Perbadanan Stadium Nasional; dan Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi. — Bernama

Ulasan: Macam mana kalau Menteri tertentu kena jawab bagi pihak kementeriannya di Parlimen. Tapi seperti selama ini, laporan tinggal laporan kerana tiada tindakan disiplin/mahkamah. Menteri dan kroni senyum.

Haji dan Malcolm X

Wan Mohamad Wasif Wan Mohamad  

Menjelang musim haji yang bakal tiba,saya membaca kembali buku,’’Malcolm X: As They Knew Him ‘’(editor David Gallen, 1992) dan kali ini tumpuan lebih diberikan kepada cerita perjalanan haji Malcolm X .

Lebih dikenali sebagai Malcolm X, Malik ElShabazz (1925-1965), pemimpin pejuang hak asasi kulit hitam di Amerika yang aktif dengan Nation of Islam (NOI) di bawah pimpinan Elijah Muhammad telah mengalami perubahan yang ketara terhadap pemikirannya sebaik sahaja menunaikan ibadah haji di Makkah.

Sebelum menunaikan ibadah haji, beliau agak lantang memperjuangkan hak-hak bangsa kulit hitam (African American) dan dilihat mempunyai sikap anti bangsa kulit putih.

Pada bulan April 20 1964, Malcolm X telah mula menulis pengalaman beliau sewaktu menunaikan haji di Makkah, dan menceritakan bagaimana beliau berjumpa dengan ramai orang berkulit putih yang turut menunaikan haji bersama beliau, semangat kesatuan persaudaraan Islam, dan hal ini membuatkan beliau mulai sedar tentang peranan Islam dalam mengatasi masalah perkauman dan mengatur hubungan antara kaum yang berbeza.

Malcom X telah menghantar poskad kepada sahabatnya, Dick Schaap yang tertulis ‘’Greetings from Mecca’’ dan menggambarkan kota Makkah sebagai ‘’the fountain of truth,love,peace and brotherhood’’.

Malcom juga menulis dalam poskad tersebut pengalamannya sewaktu menunaikan haji di Makkah antaranya: ’’eaten from the same plate with fellow Muslims whose eyes were bluer than blue,whose hair was blond,blonder than blond,whose skin was whiter than white..and we were all the same’’

Dalam poskad pertamanya kepada James Farmer pula, Malcolm X menulis:-

‘‘Dear brother James,I am now in Mecca, the most beautiful and sacred city in the world,where I have witnessed pilgrims of all colors...worshipping Allah in perfect peace and harmony and brotherhood such as I have never seen in the States’’

Malcom X menggunakan nama barunya Malik El Shabazz, menghantar poskad keduanya kepada James Farmer dan beliau mencatatkan coretan berikut:-

‘’Here I am,back in Mecca.I am still travelling,trying to broaden my mind,for I’ve seen too much of the damage narrow-mindedness can make of things and when I return home to America,I will devote what energies I have to repairing the damage’’

Dan bila ditanya adakah catatan beliau tersebut menunjukkan berlaku perubahan pada corak pemikirannya, beliau berkata ya dan mengatakan :-

‘’I have some explaining to do....I was not so lucky as you were.I had very little formal education,eight grades.I am self-educated.I read for myself:mostly in prison I read the dictionary backwards’..’Consequently I believed everything the Honourable Elijah Muhammad told us and the Honourable Elijah Muhammad told us that Islam was a black man’s religion-exclusively-and that the blue-eyed devils could not get close to Mecca,that they would be killed if they tried to enter that sacred city.In Mecca I saw blue-eyed blonds worshipping Allah just as I was,kneeling right beside me,so obviously the Honourable Elijah Muhammad had lied’

Ketika berjumpa dengan sahabatnya Maya Angelou, Malcolm X turut membicarakan pengalaman barunya di Makkah dan mengungkapkan :-

‘’I have always said whites were blue-eyed devils but I have been to Mecca and I have seen whites with blue eyes with whom I felt a brotherhood, and so I can no longer say this-that all whites are evil’’

Perjalanan kembaranya menunaikan ibadah haji di Makkah ini mencetuskan perubahan kepada pemikiran Malcolm X dari seorang yang memiliki sifat perkauman sempit kepada seorang yang menghargai perbezaan warna kulit, bangsa dan agama seseorang, memperjuangkan persaudaraan sesama umat Islam dan persaudaraan sesama manusia lainnya.

Perjuangan cinta persaudaraan dan kemanusian inilah yang membuatkan beliau berbeza pandangan dengan Elijah Muhammad dan Nation of Islam(NOI) ketika itu dan akhirnya membawa kepada pembunuhan beliau.

Pada 1 Februari 1965, tatkala baru mulai menyampaikan pidato di program anjuran Organization of Afro-American Unity(OAAU), Malcom X telah ditembak beberapa kali dan disahkan meninggal dunia selepas itu.

Malcolm X meninggal dunia sewaktu masih muda tatkala aktif dengan jelajah pidatonya di serata dunia memperjuangkan isu-isu hak asasi manusia, keamanan dan persaudaraan sejagat.

Ulasan: Apa yang kita telah dan akan buat untuk menolong agama Allah?

Laporan Audit Negara: Hanya peti undi boleh sedarkan BN

Laporan Audit: Hanya peti undi boleh sedarkan BN
Harakahdaily  

KUALA LUMPUR, 25 Okt: Meskipun ditegur setiap tahun, kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN) tetap pekak kepada saranan Ketua Audit Negara (KAN), bahkan budaya penyelewengan, pembaziran, ketirisan dan keborosan semakin subur dalam pengurusan kewangan negara, kata Ketua Penerangan PAS Pusat, Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man.

Dalam satu kenyataan hari ini, Tuan Ibrahim menyimpulkan bahawa kerajaan BN tidak akan faham bahasa laporan audit, yang boleh menyedarkan mereka hanyalah bahasa daripada ‘peti undi’ apabila Laporan Audit 2010 mendedahkan lagi penyelewengan yang sama seperti tahun-tahun terdahulunya dalam pengurusan projek dan pembelian perkakas agensi kerajaan.

Mengikut laporan terbaru, antara teguran yang dibuat KAN, ia kelakuan agensi kerajaan yang sangat jelas melanggari undang-undang.

Sebagai contoh, kata Tuan Ibrahim, bangunan tambahan Perpustakaan Negara yang diduduki tanpa sijil CF tidak sepatutnya berlaku kerana sebagai sebuah agensi kerajaan, mereka mesti tahu peraturan dan risiko menduduki sesebuah bangunan tanpa Sijil Boleh Menduduki (CF).

“Demikian juga teguran terhadap banyaknya projek kerajaan diberi melalui runding terus dan ianya jelas suatu tindakan untuk memberi projek kepada kroni dan mereka yang tidak layak menerimanya.

Antara projek runding terus yang merugikan negara ialah pembelian kuda “sakit” oleh Majlis Sukan Negara. Daripada 23 ekor kuda yang dibeli dengan harga RM246,000 seekor, hanya 5 ekor sahaja layak bertanding,” kata Tuan Ibrahim, yang juga Pesuruhjaya PAS Pahang.

Tuan Ibrahim juga membangkitkan keborosan dalam Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia (JTLM) membelanjakan lebih daripada RM128,000, iaitu lebih 2,810% di dalam pembelian pelbagai jenis peralatan.

Yang paling menjengkelkan, kata beliau ialah pembelian satu binokular oleh JLTM pada harga RM56,350 or 2,805% tinggi daripada harga pasaran RM1,940.

“Mara (Majlis Amanah Rakyat) juga tidak kurang hebatnya kerana sanggup membeli ketuhar hampir 300% (RM1,200) lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran RM419 dan “katil boleh lipat” pada lima kali ganda RM500 yang harga pasarannya RM100. Keborosan sedemikian ini tidak kena pada tempatnya kerana ia tidak mendatangkan sebarang faedah pada warga Mara,” tegur beliau lagi.

Selain itu, kata Tuan Ibrahim syarikat-syarikat GLC yang ditegur bertahun-tahun juga terus dilanda kerugian. Antara yang mencatat kerugian yang besar adalah Syarikat Perumahan Negara Bhd (RM21.4 juta), Indah Water Konsortium Bhd (RM33.4 juta), Aset Global Network Sdn Bhd (RM41.1 juta), Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (RM92.6 juta), manakala Prasarana Bhd (RM367.1 juta).

Pada skop yang lebih besar, kata beliau ialah kenaikan hutang negara sebanyak 12.3% kepada RM407.11 billion pada 2010 daripada RM362.39 billion pada 2009...

Ulasan: Begitulah kroni mencuri wang rakyat...

Umno sedia terima hudud daripada hidup tanpa rasuah?

Oleh Ahmad Lutfi Othman

Siapa dapat menolak hakikat bahawa Umno-BN meraih kuasa dan kemudiannya mempertahankan takhta melalui proses "pembelian undi", dasar "patron-client (politik penaung-dinaung)" dan "rasuah" yang sudah berakar-umbi sejak zaman berzaman serta sukar untuk dicerai-tanggalkan lagi.

Boleh anda bayangkan Umno tanpa rasuah, salahguna kuasa, pembolotan kekayaan negara, monopoli tender projek yang memberi pulangan lumayan?

Maaf cakap, pada hemat saya, Umno mungkin lebih bersedia menerima pelaksanaan hukum hudud daripada hidup tanpa korupsi dan nepotisme. Ya, hudud seperti diamalkan di Arab Saudi dan Pakistan ...

Justeru, biarpun Umno kalah di Kelantan sejak 21 tahun lalu, namun dengan agihan projek daripada pusat yang sarat dengan elemen habuan rasuah kepada setiap hieraki kepimpinannya di sana, parti itu masih nampak bertenaga. Malah, rasuah yang membusuk dalam usus Umno itu akan sentiasa menjadi penghalang daripada mereka kembali bertakhta di Kelantan. 

Begitu juga dengan keadaannya di negeri-negeri yang kini dikuasai Pakatan Rakyat; talian hayat Umno bergantung kepada naungan kerajaan persekutuan, yang turut melimpahkan materi untuk terus "merasuahkan" pengundi dengan niat untuk mengembalikan kuasa. Semangat kesukarelawanan sudah pupus. Lagi pun apa lagi yang mahu "diperjuangkan", 'kan?

Sekali lagi saya bertanya, bolehkah anda bayangkan bagaimana Umno mahu survive tanpa mendakap erat amalan rasuah, tumbuk rusuk atau makan suap itu? Bagi saya, tidaklah sukar untuk membayangkan masa depan Umno jika talian hayatnya itu diputuskan, terutama apabila kerajaan persekutuan bertukar tangan dan Putrajaya diambil alih.

Organisasi Umno sendiri akan menjadi pincang, tempang dan lumpuh jika tidak "dilicinkan" oleh "wang rasuah", yang disalurkan secara rasmi atau tidak rasmi, melalui tabung politiknya, yang dikutip "secara profesional" daripada sumber dana awam. 

Bukan berita mengejutkan kita mendengar jutaan ringgit terpaksa "dilaburkan" untuk calon-calon yang bertanding di peringkat bahagian, apatah lagi pusat, memilih saf kepemimpinan Umno. Jawatan dalam parti menjanjikan keistimewaan, sama ada menduduki posisi dalam kerajaan, syarikat berkepentingan kerajaan GLC, pihak berkuasa tempatan (PBT), selain peluang meraih kekayaan melalui penganugerahan tender projek-projek kerajaan.

Soal berapa ramai pemimpin Umno dicekup SPRM, seterusnya didakwa di mahkamah dan akhirnya kebanyakan mereka dibebaskan, bukanlah isu besar. Dalam Pelan Hala Tuju Program Transformasi Kerajaan (GTP), terbitan Jabatan Perdana Menteri, halaman 154, dicatatkan: "Pendakwaan yang berjaya terhadap individu yang berkuasa juga jarang berlaku, menyebabkan orang ramai percaya bahawa kami melindungi ahli politik dan individu yang mempunyai hubungan politik."

Mengenali agensi pencegahan rasuah daripada dekat sejak lebih 10 tahun lalu, dengan pengalaman saya membuat pelbagai aduan rasmi membabitkan orang kenamaan (VIP), sudah cukup untuk membuktikan bahawa banyak kes salahguna kuasa bukan saja boleh terlepas, malah tidak mampu pun untuk dihidu SPRM. Mungkin ada kes dilihat salah daripada segi moral dan etika, tetapi "dibenarkan" oleh undang-undang.

Tidak keterlaluan apabila ada pihak secara sinis berkata: "Sistem sedia ada telah menternak perasuah-perasuah besar." Malangnya, Pelan Integriti Nasional 2004 yang diharap berupaya menjadi formula penyelesaian terbaik masih belum mendatangkan hasil. Konsep integriti belum membudaya dalam diri atau personaliti, apatah lagi dalam sistem dan institusi.

Projek-projek kerajaan, khususnya yang bernilai dan berprofil tinggi, masih diuruskan secara tender rundingan, misalnya pembinaan Istana Negara yang baru. Bukan saja kos projek melambung tinggi daripada harga siling, malah kontraktor kroni yang dipilih langsung tiada pengalaman. Selepas mendapat kritikan hebat, kini banyak projek dianugerahkan melalui proses tender terhad (bersaing sesama suku-sakat) -- bukannya tender terbuka -- sedangkan ia masih terikat kuat dengan amalan kronisme dan pilih kasih.

Justeru, saya tertarik untuk melihat pembentangan bajet 2012 daripada aspek ini. Apakah ruang dan peluang rasuah, penyelewengan perolehan serta ketirisan yang selama ini menghanguskan RM28 bilion setiap tahun, telah ditutup ketat? Buku Jingga yang diterbitkan Pakatan Rakyat juga mencatatkan, tiga kali ganda hasil negara hilang melalui rasuah, berbanding yang dibelanjakan untuk subsidi minyak rakyat.

Usahlah tersilau dengan "kemilau" pelbagai insentif one-off, namun perhatikan juga habuan yang dibolot para kroni dan suku-sakat elit pemerintah, misalnya siapa yang mendapat kontrak pembinaan infrastruktur, penjenamaan semula projek yang gagal, pelepasan cukai kepada kerabat.

Misalnya, kes pemaju hartanah di KLIFD, yang projeknya bernilai RM26 bilion, telah diberikan pelepasan cukai sebanyak 70% bagi tempoh 5 tahun. Pada kadar cukai korporat 25%, sebanyak RM1.3 bilion wang rakyat, yang sepatutnya boleh dimanfaatkan untuk pembangunan negara, akan bolos begitu sahaja ke tangan kroni.
 
Dengan itu, saya cukup bersetuju dengan penekanan Ketua Pembangkang, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim di Parlimen, 10 Oktober lalu: "Belanjawan 2012 ini tidak lebih daripada senarai hadiah-hadiah kepada kroni dan golongan berkepentingan. Ratusan bilion akan dibelanjakan semata-mata kerana kroni akan diterus didahulukan, projek-projek diberi keutamaan, kemudian sisa bakinya barulah diagihkan kepada rakyat." 

Benarlah apabila Anwar merumuskan: "Belanjawan 2012 menzahirkan ketagihan BN kepada rasuah dan penyelewengan."


After 42 years

A Libyan American poet commemorates the overthrow of Kadafi
By Khaled Mattawa, October 25, 2011 

Five years old when the dictator took over in a coup —

curfew shut our city down

Bloodless coup, they said —

The many who thought this could be good.

The dictator, a young man, a shy recluse assumed the helm, bent in piety,

the dead sun of megalomania hidden in his eyes.

Could not go to the store to buy bread or newspaper,

could not leave home, visit friends,

the radio thundering hatred, retching blood-curdling song —

Signs that went unread

Factories built and filched, houses stolen, newspapers shut down,

decades of people killed, 42 years.

But that's all over now —

How can you say over when it took 42 years —

I was five when the dictator took my brother away

Over now, 42 years, must look ahead.

His face half blood-covered, half smirking

Like Batman's Joker,

hands raised, fingers pressed together upward

Saying wait, calm down, wait

Wait 42 years — five years old when my father was killed

standing in front of a hotel.

Bloodless coup,

the country like a helpless teenage girl

forced into marriage hoping her groom will be kind.

In between there was blankness

that burned like a million of suns into our eyes,

Death like air, everywhere.

What was it like to be held by his men?

Fingers pulled out, testicles fried,

To be hung from a clothesline rope , the dictator's mistress pulling at my legs?

How many killed by his men over the decades,

The cracked skulls, the mass graves, the uncounted dead?

What and who taught you O sons of my country to be so fearless cruel?

Him, they say, for 42 years, 42 years of him.

Who taught you to be reckless heroic?

The no-life we had to live, under him, the lives we were asked to live as dead.

Alive we want him alive, many kept shouting.

So that they could give him tastes of his own medicine?

Alive, alive!

And many others disbelieving they'd caught him.

Their shrill Allahu Akbars exclamations of astonishment —

What have I done O Lord to deserve the honor of capturing the rat?

Exclamations of disbelief —

The nightmare — GAME OVER — the night-game of breaking into houses, arresting sons; the day game of civility — we'll bring him in a few hours —

we'll bring him back in 42 years —

Could it be so easy — GAME OVER — the capturing of a 69-year-old rat?

A clown in a rat-colored outfit, a wild mop of hair, a wig

Holding a golden pistol like a child playing hero, high-heeled boots.

Is that what our history amounted to?

No.

Because somewhere there were suns that would never light.

Somewhere, there were holes in the air that was full of death.

We managed to hold our breath and live our lives.

Could it be so simple O Lord to end an epoch? —

killing kidnapping murder massacre slit throats vaginal tests for women he wished to sex vaginal rapes anal rapes of dissidents he wished to humiliate — humiliation denigration outsourced whippings money changed on oil tankers boiling water poured on the entreating heads of maids hot iron pressed on servant flesh slit throats broken ribs feet whipped until swelled like cantaloupes bodies left hanging in public squares —

I was five when my brother disappeared,

I was thirteen, I was twenty, I was seventy six, I was never

allowed to reach birth.

What will be our aftermath?

One minute and all of that history is found hiding

like a rat, history like a rat,

hiding in a sewer drain.

History too hot to hold —

the magic was in seeing it come to end —

the pain too dark to bear, too light, too cold,

the astonishment unbearable, would kill you if it lasted too long.

He died of his wounds.

No, no, they just shot him dead.

Perhaps he was a magnet and he drew evil out of men's chests,

his hands, his hands saying wait, wait

reached into their lungs and wound and knotted their raw souls,

a magnet now siphoning cruelty to itself.

No, no, they just shot him dead.

But I heard he died of his wounds.

Too much for a young man who could not stop being a killer,

a young man who did what millions wished to do.

To tear him to bits, my mother's friend once said,

to tear him to bits, six millions hearts had prayed —

O God grant me the sight of him dead!

One bullet, or two, some say three,

despite the pleading fingers tainted with their own blood.

Surprised as if he'd never seen or heard of blood,

Surprised that he too would bleed if cut.

One bullet, two, or three and it's done with, our history, our epoch.

The book of misery read

The rabid beast captured, kicked about and shot in the head.

O Lord is that our history tossed into a freezer like a lump of rotting flesh?

O Lord how little our lives must be, when so much can be buried lost, dumped in a

hole, forgotten dust!

No, because

somewhere, an earthly sun is shining on us, with us, again.

There is air in the air again.

What will our aftermath be then?

We wash our hands,

put on spotless clothes.

There is no "after" until we pray for all the dead.

Khaled Mattawa is a poet and a professor of creative writing at the University of Michigan. His latest book of poetry is "Tocqueville." 
Five years old when the dictator took over in a coup —

curfew shut our city down

Bloodless coup, they said —

The many who thought this could be good.

The dictator, a young man, a shy recluse assumed the helm, bent in piety,

the dead sun of megalomania hidden in his eyes.

Could not go to the store to buy bread or newspaper,

could not leave home, visit friends,

the radio thundering hatred, retching blood-curdling song —

Signs that went unread

Factories built and filched, houses stolen, newspapers shut down,

decades of people killed, 42 years.

But that's all over now —

How can you say over when it took 42 years —

I was five when the dictator took my brother away

Over now, 42 years, must look ahead.

His face half blood-covered, half smirking

Like Batman's Joker,

hands raised, fingers pressed together upward

Saying wait, calm down, wait

Wait 42 years — five years old when my father was killed

standing in front of a hotel.

Bloodless coup,

the country like a helpless teenage girl

forced into marriage hoping her groom will be kind.

In between there was blankness

that burned like a million of suns into our eyes,

Death like air, everywhere.

What was it like to be held by his men?

Fingers pulled out, testicles fried,

To be hung from a clothesline rope , the dictator's mistress pulling at my legs?

How many killed by his men over the decades,

The cracked skulls, the mass graves, the uncounted dead?

What and who taught you O sons of my country to be so fearless cruel?

Him, they say, for 42 years, 42 years of him.

Who taught you to be reckless heroic?

The no-life we had to live, under him, the lives we were asked to live as dead.

Alive we want him alive, many kept shouting.

So that they could give him tastes of his own medicine?

Alive, alive!

And many others disbelieving they'd caught him.

Their shrill Allahu Akbars exclamations of astonishment —

What have I done O Lord to deserve the honor of capturing the rat?

Exclamations of disbelief —

The nightmare — GAME OVER — the night-game of breaking into houses, arresting sons; the day game of civility — we'll bring him in a few hours —

we'll bring him back in 42 years —

Could it be so easy — GAME OVER — the capturing of a 69-year-old rat?

A clown in a rat-colored outfit, a wild mop of hair, a wig

Holding a golden pistol like a child playing hero, high-heeled boots.

Is that what our history amounted to?

No.

Because somewhere there were suns that would never light.

Somewhere, there were holes in the air that was full of death.

We managed to hold our breath and live our lives.

Could it be so simple O Lord to end an epoch? —

killing kidnapping murder massacre slit throats vaginal tests for women he wished to sex vaginal rapes anal rapes of dissidents he wished to humiliate — humiliation denigration outsourced whippings money changed on oil tankers boiling water poured on the entreating heads of maids hot iron pressed on servant flesh slit throats broken ribs feet whipped until swelled like cantaloupes bodies left hanging in public squares —

I was five when my brother disappeared,

I was thirteen, I was twenty, I was seventy six, I was never

allowed to reach birth.

What will be our aftermath?

One minute and all of that history is found hiding

like a rat, history like a rat,

hiding in a sewer drain.

History too hot to hold —

the magic was in seeing it come to end —

the pain too dark to bear, too light, too cold,

the astonishment unbearable, would kill you if it lasted too long.

He died of his wounds.

No, no, they just shot him dead.

Perhaps he was a magnet and he drew evil out of men's chests,

his hands, his hands saying wait, wait

reached into their lungs and wound and knotted their raw souls,

a magnet now siphoning cruelty to itself.

No, no, they just shot him dead.

But I heard he died of his wounds.

Too much for a young man who could not stop being a killer,

a young man who did what millions wished to do.

To tear him to bits, my mother's friend once said,

to tear him to bits, six millions hearts had prayed —

O God grant me the sight of him dead!

One bullet, or two, some say three,

despite the pleading fingers tainted with their own blood.

Surprised as if he'd never seen or heard of blood,

Surprised that he too would bleed if cut.

One bullet, two, or three and it's done with, our history, our epoch.

The book of misery read

The rabid beast captured, kicked about and shot in the head.

O Lord is that our history tossed into a freezer like a lump of rotting flesh?

O Lord how little our lives must be, when so much can be buried lost, dumped in a

hole, forgotten dust!

No, because

somewhere, an earthly sun is shining on us, with us, again.

There is air in the air again.

What will our aftermath be then?

We wash our hands,

put on spotless clothes.

There is no "after" until we pray for all the dead.

Khaled Mattawa is a poet and a professor of creative writing at the University of Michigan. His latest book of poetry is "Tocqueville." 

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

Mosque and state

By Doyle McManus

October 23, 2011 

At a conference two years ago, I sat in on a meeting between U.S. officials and young Islamist politicians from Tunisia, Jordan and other countries in the Middle East. The Islamists wanted to know: Would the Americans allow them to run in free elections, even if it meant they might come to power? The Americans turned the question back at them: Would the Islamists, if they won, allow free and democratic elections, even if it might mean losing power?

At the time, it was mostly a theoretical discussion — but now those questions have become very real.

In Tunisia, Islamists are expected to win the largest share of parliamentary seats in the first post-uprising election. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood is the most powerful political faction, and it has spawned Islamist offshoots to the left and right. And in Libya, Islamists played a major role in the revolution that toppled Moammar Kadafi and are likely to be major players in any new government.

At that conference, I sat next to the grand old man of Egypt's secular democrats, Saad Eddin Ibrahim, a veteran of Cairo politics — and of Hosni Mubarak's prisons. He favored a clear division between mosque and state, but he had no illusions.

"A lot of [the Islamists] aren't democrats at heart," he said. "But you cannot get rid of these people. You have to deal with them."

And that, in a nutshell, is the dilemma facing the U.S. and anyone else who worries that the Arab world's Islamists could turn out to be like the Muslim revolutionaries who seized control in Iran 32 years ago — authoritarian, hostile and democratic only in name.

Many of the Islamists aren't liberal pluralists at heart. They want Islam to be their countries' official religion. They want some form of Sharia to be the basis of civil law. They don't like Israel, and they don't like U.S. policy on Israel.

All that has made many Americans identify the Islamists as an outcome to the revolutions that we can't live with. Some members of Congress have suggested that U.S. aid to Egypt be cut off if the Muslim Brotherhood wins a majority in the country's parliament.

But there are three problems with that kind of thinking: The Islamists are a legitimate political force, they're likely to win in free elections, and they're not going away.

The new Arab democracies have Islamist parties for much the same reason that Israel has Jewish religious parties and Italy has a conservative Catholic party: Some voters want to see their religious beliefs reflected in their country's politics. In the United States, though they don't have a separate party, many Christian conservatives might embrace that sentiment too.

The problem with Islamists, unlike those other religious politicians, is that in some places, when they have gained power, they have shut democracy down, denying secular parties a chance to compete. That's what happened in Iran. But in Turkey and Iraq, it hasn't.

And there's broader evidence that over the long run, Islamic parties aren't the threat to democracy that many believe. Two researchers at the University of North Carolina, Charles Kurzman and Ijlal Naqvi, have studied 160 elections in the Muslim world in which Islamist parties competed. They found that Islamists tended to score highest in "breakthrough" elections, the first votes held after a revolution. But after that, secular parties tended to gain strength.

"In general, the more routine elections become, the worse Islamic parties do," they found. "In those Muslim-majority countries where elections were freest, Islamic parties performed worse."

Moreover, they found that over time Islamic parties often liberalize in order to win support from more moderate voters. That may already be happening in Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood has said that it believes non-Islamist groups, including Christians, should get a voice in writing a new constitution, and where the leader of one major Islamist faction has called for a new and more tolerant "Islamic liberalism."

Egypt's Ibrahim, for one, believes the practice of democracy could temper the Islamists' ideology. "The only way the Islamists can gain legitimacy is to turn into democrats," he said. "We should give them a chance."

So far, the Obama administration has taken a cautious approach toward the Islamist parties poised to win power across the Arab world. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has authorized U.S. diplomats to talk with members of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is not on the official U.S. list of terrorist organizations. But those contacts have been tentative and at a low level. The U.S. ambassador in Cairo, Anne Patterson, has said she isn't "comfortable" enough with the idea to talk with Brotherhood figures herself.

That's shortsighted because since the Brotherhood is likely to have major influence on Egypt's maintenance of its peace treaty with Israel, a core U.S. interest.

Americans won't agree with everything Islamist politicians say or do, any more than we endorse everything politicians in Russia, China and Mexico do. But the Islamists are a lasting political force whether the United States likes it or not.

If Egypt, Tunisia and Libya are to make democracy work, they're going to have to find a way to reconcile Islam and pluralism. We can help that happen by engaging more seriously with the Islamists — both by urging them to play by democratic rules and by treating them as the legitimate players they are.

doyle.mcmanus@latimes.com

The Tunisian model : A moderate Islamic party has claimed victory. Can it really work comfortably within a democracy?

October 24, 2011, 4:47 p.m. 

Tunisia's was the first and in some ways the easiest of the "Arab Spring" revolts. President Zine el Abidine ben Ali fled his country after only a month of demonstrations. Although security forces killed dozens of protesters during that chaotic period, the country nevertheless regrouped quickly, put an interim system in place and began to plan for the future. In that sense, Tunisia offered a relatively appealing model for subsequent revolts in Bahrain, Egypt, Libya and Syria — not all of which have come off quite so smoothly.

Now will Tunisia offer a model for what to do next? Voters turned out in high numbers on Sunday to choose an assembly to draw up a new constitution. It was the first post-revolt election in the Arab world since the Arab Spring began, and voters were for the most part orderly and enthusiastic, according to news reports. Preliminary indications are that the big winner was the moderate Islamic party Nahda, which has committed itself to working within the rules of a pluralistic, democratic society.

If it can really do that, great — and not just for Tunisia. Powerful tensions exist between Islamists and secularists in most of the countries that have faced revolts this year. In Libya, for instance, interim leader Mustafa Abdul Jalil worried many of his compatriots when he said Sunday that he hoped his country would become an "Islamic state" in which polygamy would not be illegal but charging interest would. In Egypt, the not-terribly-moderate Muslim Brotherhood is likely to outperform others in the upcoming parliamentary elections.

If elections are to be the future of the region — and that is by no means settled — the world will have to acknowledge the powerful appeal of Islamist parties and begin to figure out whether and under what circumstances such parties can exist comfortably in a democracy. There's some precedent for this in Turkey, where the Islamist party of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has managed — despite secularists' fears — to mix a conservative, religious message with a modern, development-oriented approach that works within the electoral system.

We hope such a model can succeed. It's less important whether a nation's leaders are religious or secular than whether the country is stable, guarantees individual rights, transfers power peacefully, protects minorities and tolerates dissent.

That is separate, of course, from whether an Islamic government will share U.S. interests. Would an Islamic government in Tunisia, Egypt or Libya distance itself from the West or grow increasingly anti-Israel? Would that in turn persuade some Americans to reduce aid or limit involvement at a moment when these countries need help building democratic institutions? All that is certain is that democracy, to which the U.S. has long pledged its support, is messy and doesn't always bring the hoped-for results. But it's the best system around. 

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

Al-Nahda claims victory in Tunisia poll

Moderate Islamist party says it has won more than 40 per cent of seats as PDP concedes it will be in opposition. 
24 Oct 2011 22:25

The moderate Islamist party al-Nahda has claimed that it has won more than 40 per cent of seats in Tunisia's 217-member consitutent assembly, following the country's historic election.

"The first confirmed results show that al-Nahda has obtained first place nationally and in most districts," Abelhamid Jlassi, the party's campaign manager, said at a news conference citing its own election monitors' reports.

The party's claim that it won 90 seats came ahead of an announcement by ISIE, the country's independent election commission, of the provisional results for overseas seats…

Comment: For the good of every Tunisian, please pray for the success of Al-Nahda, the Islamic party.

Tunisia

Holly Pickett for The New York Times
Updated: Oct. 24, 2011

For years, Tunisia was known mostly as the most European country of North Africa, with a relatively large middle class, liberal social norms, broad gender equality and welcoming Mediterranean beaches. But in January 2011 it took center stage as the launching pad of the wave of revolt that swept through the Arab world and beyond.

For all its modern traits, Tunisia had one of the most repressive governments in a region full of police states, and levels of corruption among its elite that became intolerable once the economic malaise that has gripped southern Europe spread to the country.

The uprising began in December 2010, when a fruit vendor, Mohamed Bouazizi, set himself on fire in the impoverished inland town of Sidi Bouzid to protest his lack of opportunity and the disrespect of the police.

In what became known as the Jasmine Revolution, a sudden and explosive wave of street protests ousted the authoritarian president, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, who had ruled with an iron hand for 23 years. On January 14, Mr. Ben Ali left the country, after trying unsuccessfully to placate the demonstrators with promises of elections. According to government figures issued later, 78 protesters died and 94 were injured during the demonstrations.

In the months after the revolution, Tunisia struggled with continued instability, new tensions between Islamicists and secular liberals and a still-limping economy. But of all the Arab states it may have been the best positioned for a successful transition to a liberal democracy, with its relatively small, homogenous population of about 12 million, comparatively high levels of education, a large middle class, an apolitical military, a moderate Islamist movement and a long history of a unified national identity.

Millions of Tunisians cast votes on Oct. 24 for an assembly to draft a constitution and shape a new government, in a burst of pride and hope that after inspiring uprisings across the Arab world, their small country could now lead the way to democracy.

In another first for the region, a moderate Islamic party, Ennahda, appeared to emerge as the big winner. Preliminary results indicated it had won at least 30 percent of the votes cast, and party officials told a news conference the party had come out ahead in nearly every voting district. Ali Laredi, a top Ennahda official, said it expected to receive possibly more than 50 percent when the final results are tallied.

The party’s leaders had vowed to create another kind of new model for the Arab world, one reconciling Islamic principles with Western-style democracy.

After the Revolution

The prime minister, Mohamed Ghannouchi, created a government of unity, but in late February, as demonstrations continued, he resigned in response to complaints that he was too closely tied to Mr. Ben Ali. He was replaced by Beji Caid Essebi, who was chosen because during a long career as an official of the Tunisian dictatorship he built a record of trying to change the system from within.

Mr. Essebi’s caretaker government was confronted with nearly daily protests by a variety of groups, and the police force, provincial governments and the judicial system have all been badly weakened by their links to the ousted regime.

The interim government scheduled elections for July 24, when voters were to pick members of an assembly that will rewrite the constitution. But in June it announced the vote would be held in October. Election officials said that millions of Tunisians were unregistered, while leaders of the dozens of new parties that sprang up since the revolution said they needed more time to be able to compete with Ennhada, an Islamic party that had been banned by the dictatorship.

Polling suggests that Ennahda — whose name means the renaissance in Arabic — enjoys broader support than any of the country’s other 60-odd authorized political parties, most of whom did not exist until after the revolution.

Accused as subversives or terrorists, members of Ennahda bore the repressive brunt of Mr. Ben-Ali’s reign — two decades of torture, prison or exile — suffering that has established their credibility, particularly among the more conservative residents of the country’s rural areas.

Mr. Essebsi has responded to the continuing protests and occasional violence in the capital and around the country by alternately pushing back and giving in. In early September, as protests and violence continued, Mr. Essebsi announced a broad security crackdown, including authorizing the Interior Ministry to ban meetings deemed to threaten stability and to put individuals under house arrest.

In June, Mr. Ben Ali and his wife, Leila Trabelsi, had been convicted in absentia of theft and unlawful possession of cash and jewelry. The judge in the case sentenced them to 35 years in prison and levied a $65 million fine. The couple also face drug and weapon charges.

Birth of a Movement

The Tunisian revolution began when Mohamed Bouazizi, a college-educated street vendor, burned himself to death in protest of his dismal prospects amid Tunisia’s poverty. A wave of violent demonstrations spread, of the kind not seen since Mr. Ben Ali came to power 23 years before in a bloodless coup. Dozens died as security forces fired on protesters.

The protesters came together after circulating calls to rally over social networks like Facebook and Twitter. Many were unemployed college graduates, and they angrily demanded more jobs and denounced what they called the self-enrichment of Tunisia’s ruling family.

It is not religion, nor the adventures of a single leader, nor wars with Israel that have energized Tunisia, the subsequent uprising in Egypt and elsewhere in the region. Across the Middle East, a somewhat nostalgic notion of a common Arab identity, intersecting with a visceral sense of what amounts to a decent life, is driving protests that have bound the region in a sense of a shared destiny.

A remarkable two-year collaboration gave birth to a new force in the Arab world — a pan-Arab youth movement dedicated to spreading democracy in a region without it. Young Egyptian and Tunisian activists brainstormed on the use of technology to evade surveillance, commiserated about torture and traded practical tips on how to stand up to rubber bullets and organize barricades.

They fused their secular expertise in social networks with a discipline culled from religious movements and combined the energy of soccer fans with the sophistication of surgeons. Breaking free from older veterans of the Arab political opposition, they relied on tactics of nonviolent resistance channeled from an American scholar through a Serbian youth brigade — but also on marketing tactics borrowed from Silicon Valley.

Rulers’ Lavish Lifestyles Fueled Anger

Protesters seemed to direct much of their anger at the great wealth and lavish life of President Ben Ali’s second wife, Leila Trabelsi, a former hairdresser, and their extended family, most notably their son-in-law, the billionaire businessman Mohamed Sakher El Materi.

A gracious dinner at Mr. Materi’s home was detailed in a cable from the American ambassador to Tunisia that was released by the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks and fueled at least some of the outrage: a beachfront compound decorated with Roman artifacts; ice cream and frozen yogurt flown from St. Tropez, France; a Bangladeshi butler and South African nanny; and a pet tiger in a cage.

State television reported the arrests for “crimes against Tunisia” of 33 members of Mr. Ben Ali’s family. The government also said its prosecutors had opened an investigation into the family’s overseas assets, while the Swiss government moved to freeze their assets in Swiss banks.

A Successful Election Day

For Tunisians, the scenes at the polls in October — a turnout far above expectations, orderly lines stretching around blocks, satisfied smiles at blue-inked fingers — already seemed to wipe away 10 months of anxiety and protests over the future of the revolution that ousted Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali. For the first time in their history, many Tunsians said, they expected an honest count of their ballots to determine the country’s future. 

Many people expressed faith that the act of voting itself would change Tunisia for the better, no matter who won. Some argued that democracy would make public officials more accountable. “The people in power know that we are keeping a watchful eye,” said Kamel Abdel, 45, a high school philosophy teacher voting in the crowded slum of Tadamon.

Most voters said their biggest concerns were the economy, jobs, and finding candidates with integrity.

Ennahda had a long history of opposition to the dictatorship before Mr. Ben Ali’s persecution eviscerated it in the 1990s, and its leaders have said that they hope to establish a durable, pluralistic democracy that will protect the rights of individuals and minorities regardless of who is in power. They often cite the model of Turkey, a secular democracy now governed by a party with an Islamic identity.

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/tunisia/index.html

Nasionalis punca murtad – Nik Aziz

Nazri Abdullah  

KUALA LUMPUR, 25 Okt: Mursyidul Am PAS, Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat menyifatkan gejala murtad yang berlaku di negara ini adalah akibat tidak melaksanakan pemerintahan Islam.

Menurutnya, dengan mengambil fahaman nasionalis, menyebabkan manusia akan merasa lekeh kepada Islam dan akan mengagung-agungkan fahaman kebangsaan.

"Di Malaysia ni punca murtad adalah kerana nasionalis. Golongan nasionalis ini buat manusia rasa lekeh kepada Islam kerana mereka tolak Islam ambik kebangsaan.

"Daripada rasa lekeh ini lah timbul masalah menggelongsor luruh daripada Islam. Ini kita panggil murtad," katanya kepada Harakahdaily…

Ulasan: Faham kebangsaan ini tidak berupa menyelesaikan masalah yang kita ada. Ertinya di dunia terlepas dari redha Allah dan di akhirat tak akan di terima. Kita sangat-sangat rugi.


Hilangnya idealisme universi-universiti Malaysia

Oleh Prof Dr Mohamad Tajuddin Mohamad Rasdi

Baru-baru ini saya terbaca tentang universiti awam kita yang gagal menduduki senarai 400 universiti terbaik dunia mengikut sistem penyenaraian Times Higher Education WorldUniversity Rankings. Mengejutkan. Atau perlukah kita terkejut? 

Saya menulis rencana ini untuk menunjukkan bahawa institut pengajian tinggi awam (IPTA) Malaysia sudah hilang segala bentuk tanggungjawab dalam pembangunan bangsa (nation) dan hanya ghairah mengejar kedudukan ranking.

Mengapa saya mengajar di universiti

Apabila saya menyertai UTM, hampir 25 tahun lalu, apa yang saya mahu lakukan adalah semata-mata untuk menyelidiki seni bina Islam dan Malaysia, dan menggunakan pengetahuan itu bagi menghasilkan seni bina yang lebih bermakna kepada masyarakat kita di negara ini serta menyumbang kepada pembangunan intelektual dan pemikiran tentang seni bina Islam.

Saya berjanji pada diri sendiri untuk menulis seberapa banyak buku, kertas akademik, rencana media massa dan media elektronik untuk menyebarkan sebanyak mungkin ilmu pengetahuan yang ada.

Saya juga berjanji pada diri saya bahawa saya mesti melatih sekurang-kurangnya 20 sarjana PhD yang akan membangunkan dua bidang akademik dan mewujudkan beberapa pusat seni bina Islam, masjid dan pembangunan komuniti, perumahan yang lebih baik dan seni bina kemasyarakatan. Itu sahaja.

Tidak pernah dalam sejarah kerjaya saya, terfikir saya untuk menjadi world class atau memaksa diri untuk “tokoh yang diiktiraf di peringkat antarabangsa” atau membantu UTM menjadi satu daripada 10 universiti terbaik dunia. Tidak pernah sama sekali.

Mengapa? Semata-mata kerana saya rasa ilmu seni bina sepatutnya membantu kita hidup dalam persekitaran yang lebih bermakna dan berdaya mampan.

Saya juga mahu menghasilkan seberapa banyak alat bantuan pengajaran seperti video dan portal laman web yang akan menjadikan pembelajaran sebagai sesuatu yang menyeronokkan bukan sahaja kepada pelajar tetapi juga orang awam yang dapat membantu mempengaruhi dasar-dasar politik yang bakal mengubah undang-undang kecil pembinaan atau garis panduan untuk pembinaan masjid, rumah, sekolah, bangunan komuniti dan banyak lagi.

Setahu saya, tugas seorang ahli akademik adalah untuk membantu masyarakat memahami keadaan mengikut kepakaran dalam bidang khususnya. Bukan untuk mengejar geran bernilai berjuta-juta ringgit. Bukan untuk mendapatkan Geneva Award. Bukan untuk bergambar tersenyum lebar bersama dengan Perdana Menteri. Jika ditakdirkan pun saya mendapat ketiga-tiga perkara ini, baguslah, tetapi saya tidak akan keluh-kesah tak tidur malam memikirkan bagaimana mahu menjadi seorang superstar.

Apa yang IPTA lakukan hari ini

Apa yang telah berlaku kepada universiti-universiti kita sekarang? Naib-naib Canselor tidak peduli tentang pembangunan negara bangsa tetapi hanya berminat memperkenalkan dasar-dasar pengurusan yang akan membolehkan IPTA “melonjak jauh” memasuki sistem ranking bertaraf dunia.

Bagaimana mereka melakukannya? Mula-mula sekali mereka membuat promosi universiti melalui jurnal-jurnal antarabangsa terkenal yang mempunyai indeks penerbitan Scopus atau ISI. Dengarnya, untik disiarkan dalam kebanyakan jurnal ini, harga yang perlu dibayar amat mahal sekali.

Kemudian pengurusan universiti kita ini mengupah khidmat pakar asing yang mereka rasakan mampu menulis kertas akademik yang lebih baik daripada ahli akademik kita untuk mendapat pengiktirafan. Jadi, tidak banyak ruang untuk “sumbangan kepada komuniti dan masyarakat’ tetapi hanya untuk kertas akademik dan geran penyelidikan, dan begitulah seterusnya.

Ia menjadi satu perlumbaan yang gila dan saingan yang tidak masuk akal semata-mata mengejar pengiktirafan. Kini “pengiktirafan”, “world class”, “ranking” menjadi kata-kata hikmat dalam dunia akademik semasa.

Apa kesan keghairahan mengejar ranking

Apakah kesan daripada pendekatan baru ini kepada pengurusan universiti kita? Tidak ramai yang mahu menulis buku teks untuk pelajar. Hampir tidak ada ahli akademik yang mahu menulis rencana atau buku popular menjelaskan tentang ilmu pengetahuan mereka kepada masyarakat.

Setiap ahli akademik akan melihat pelajar pasca-siswazah mereka sebagai individu yang hanya menghasilkan kertas akademik yang bakal mengharumkan nama pensyarah sebagai sebagai penulis untuk jurnal akademik.

Penyelia pengajian PhD dan ijazah sarjana tidak peduli lagi tentang usaha memupuk sarjana tetapi hanya melayan pelajar sebagai orang suruhan untuk mengendalikan seminar, menulis kertas akademik, mencari data, dan melayan mereka sebagai pembantu makmal.

Bagaimana pula dengan sarjana dan ahli akademik muda? Selepas mendapat PhD mereka terpaksa berdepan dengan petunjuk prestasi utama (KPI) yang menjadikan mereka tidak ada masa untuk renungan hidup.

Jadi apa yang sarjana muda ini lakukan? Lima dari mereka akan memeterai perjanjian bahawa jika seorang dari mereka, atau seorang dari mana-mana pelajar pasca-ijazah mereka menghasilkan satu kertas akademik, kesemua nama mereka akan terpampang di atas kertas itu.

Melalui cara ini, sarjana-sarjana muda ini akan memenuhkan CV masing-masing dengan pelbagai kertas akademik yang tidak ada kena-mengena dengan bidang kepakaran mereka.

Satu lagi bencana menimpa apabila sistem KPI yang berteraskan kertas akademik diamalkan. Pelajar pra-siswazah terkantong-kantong sendirian untuk mempertahankan kertas akademik mereka apabila pensyarah-pensyarah mereka terlalu sibuk mencari geran, terbang ke sana sini untuk menyampaikan syarahan dan menguruskan seminar, menulis kertas akademik atau naik turun pejabat Menteri untuk meminta itu dan ini.

Pemerintah sebagai inspirasi dunia akademik

Dahulunya penyelidikan dan pusat penyelidikan diwujudkan untuk merintis usaha pembangunan dalam bidang akademik yang akan membantu rakyat kita.

Tetapi hari ini saya melihat pusat-pusat pengajian ditubuhkan dan buku-buku diterbitkan atas isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan Perdana Menteri.

Saya pernah mendengar tentang sebuah IPTA yang memberi sejumlah besar peruntukan kewangan untuk kajian mengenai Islam Hadhari dari idea seorang bekas Perdana Menteri. Baru-baru ini pula satu penyelidikan dilakukan dan seminar diadakan tentang seni bina Bugis, semata-mata kerana seorang pemimpin besar negara adalah dari keturunan Bugis!

Naib-naib Canselor sibuk dengan permainan perhubungan awam kerana ingin menarik geran dan peruntukan, dan banyak masa dan usaha di IPTA telah ditumpukan kepada perhubungan awam.

Di manakah kewibawaan ahli akademik dan sarjana kita? Di manakah “jarak pendirian falsafah dan moral” di antara mereka dan pihak yang berkuasa? Jika ahli akademik dan sarjana terikat dan tunduk kepada pemerintah, siapa yang akan memberitahu rakyat tentang apa yang perlu dilakukan dan apa yang perlu diubah?

Memang sentiasa ada ketakutan di kalangan ahli akademik bahawa mereka tidak akan dinaikkan pangkat jika mengigit tangan pemerintah.

Malah Majlis Profesor Negara kelihatanya sangat takut dan sanggup membodek pemerintah dan ini telah memalukan idealisme ketinggian moral dunia akademik.

Para profesor sepatutnya menjadi teras ilmu pengetahuan untuk kebaikan rakyat tetapi mereka memilih untuk membodek bagi mendapatkan pangkat, kedudukan, projek dan geran.

Saya lebih gembira berbual tentang keadaan negara dengan pemandu teksi berbanding dengan pihak pengurusan universiti dan golongan yang kononnya bergelar akademik.

Di benak fikiran saya, universiti-universiti kita sepatutnya menghentikan keghairahan mereka terhadap sistem ranking, dan masya’Allah, hentikanlah daripada bersaing untuk mendapatkan status Research University atau Apex University.

Utamakan rakyat Malaysia

Kerajaan sepatutnya berhenti daripada menggalakkan perlumbaan keanak-anakan ini untuk menumpukan kepada pemberian geran dan keistimewaan kepada sarjana, fakulti dan institusi yang akan dapat memberi khidmat sepenuhnya kepada rakyat kita yang lebih memerlukannya.

Jika ditakdirkan kita berjaya memberi sumbangan kepada dunia, baguslah, tetapi janganlah pinggirkan ahli akademik kita yang menangani isu tempatan atau menulis untuk jurnal tempatan atau menerbitkan buku tempatan.

Kita mesti menjadi Malaysian First (Utamakan Rakyat Malaysia) dan dunia di tempat kedua. Mengapalah kita ghairah sangat untuk dunia sedangkan di negara kita ada berlambak masalah yang perlu diselesaikan?

Jika kita menumpukan semua sumber akademik yang ada untuk membantu pelajar kita, membantu guru sekolah mengajar anak kita, membantu rakyat kita memahami isu-isu ekonomi, alam sekitar, agama dan lain-lain lagi, saya melihat bahawa kita telah pun memberi satu sumbangan yang besar.

Setelah kita berjaya laksanakan itu semua, jika sistem ranking oleh Times mahu mengiktiraf kita mengikut kriterianya dalam excellence in academia, baguslah, tetapi jika kita gagal mencapai piawaian mereka, peduli apa kita!

Sekarang apa yang kita ada? Kita tidak termasuk dalam senarai 400 universiti terbaik dunia. Rakyat Malaysia tidak tahu pun apa yang universiti kita sumbangkan kecuali mengajar pelajar kita untuk mendapatkan pekerjaan.

Kita ada sekumpulan ahli akademik yang kecewa dan tertekan. Ahli-ahli akademik ini yang hanya menulis dan bercakap dalam Bahasa Melayu merasa diri mereka dipinggirkan. Jurnal tempatan semakin berkurangan dan hambar. Tidak ramai yang mahu menulis buku untuk Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka atau penerbitan universiti.

Pelajar pra-siswazah kita tidak mempunyai wibawa sebagai pemimpin kerana mereka tidak dilayan seperti orang dewasa, dan mereka juga tidak dilihat sebagai pemimpin masa depan, hanya sebagai kanak-kanak sekolah yang mahu lulus kertas peperiksaan.

Apa dah jadi? Apa lagi nak jadi? 

Permainan menghitung petikan tulisan akademik untuk mencerminkan kehebatan ilmiah adalah sesuatu yang melucukan. Sesetengah ahli akademik meluangkan sebahagian besar masa mereka untuk mengira berapa banyak petikan tulisan mereka; malah memantau dan meminta rakan-rakan akademik lain memetik tulisan mereka.

Apa yang menyedihkan ialah ada pengurusan akademik yang hanya mengambil kira petikan tulisan-tulisan ini untuk kenaikan pangkat.

Apa yang menggembirakan saya

Saya tidak pernah peduli untuk melihat kembali berapa ramai sarjana yang memetik hasil kerja saya. Saya lebih gembira apabila mengetahui seorang guru besar sekolah Australia memetik tulisan saya tentang seni bina nasional untuk dibincangkan dengan kakitangan dan pelajar sekolahnya.

Saya juga gembira apabila laman web Majlis Peguam memuatnaikkan tulisan saya mengenai jenayah yang telah disiarkan dalam akhbar The Star. Saya amat bangga apabila rencana saya mengenai orang bukan Islam dan masjid dipaparkan dalam blog Lim Kit Siang, dan apabila majalah Christian Herald menyiarkan tulisan saya mengenai isu azan.

Bagi saya, itu semua adalah petikan hasil kerja yang dapat merapatkan hubungan rakyat dan perpaduan negara. Sudah tentu ada ahli akademik yang memperkecilkan hasil kerja saya dengan mengatakan semua ini rendah mutu akademiknya kerana tidak diberi ulasan sebaya atau academic peer review.

Kepada ahli akademik seperti ini, saya ingin katakan bahawa saya tidak menyertai dunia akademik untuk masuk ke dalam satu kumpulan elit yang hanya bergaul sesama sendiri, tetapi saya menyertai universiti kerana mahu berbuat sesuatu yang baik untuk rakyat dan negara kita.

Apa yang perlu kita lakukan

Jadi, ini yang saya mahu kerajaan dan semua universiti kita lakukan. Hentikan kegilaan usaha mendapatkan status Research University dan berikan sahaja RM50 juta kepada semua IPTA untuk mempupuk bakat sarjana muda mereka.

Lebih baik kita belanjakan wang itu untuk membentuk generasi akademik akan datang daripada membina sebuah lagi masjid besar bernilai RM300 juta atau beberapa Menara Warisan atau melaksanakan semula lanskap Putrajaya setiap kali sambutan Hari Kebangsaan diadakan.

Hentikan juga kegilaan mengejar status Apex University yang telah menjadikan setiap IPTA melihat yang lain sebagai saingan untuk mengejar penerbitan akademik dan geran semata-mata.

IPTA di Malaysia pada suatu masa dahulu adalah satu keluarga yang besar tetapi sekarang mereka bercakaran untuk menyimpan kemahiran yang ada dan enggan berkongsi bakat.

Apabila UKM memohon mendapatkan khidmat saya untuk dipinjamkan selama dua tahun bagi menghasilkan penyelidikan tentang budaya dan seni bina Islam, UTM telah menolaknya tanpa berbincang dengan saya. Begitulah keangkuhan dan amalan kuku besi serta sifat “kedekut” yang wujud dalam IPTA hari ini.

Gelombang Pertama ahli akademik kita berusaha untuk mewujudkan tapak ilimiah serta menghasilkan graduan untuk keperluan industri.

Kita sekarang dalam Gelombang Kedua yang mana kita perlu menghasilkan suasana penyelidikan yang baru, menghasilkan graduan yang bukan sahaja pekerja tetapi juga pemimpin, dan mempersiapsediakan sarjana muda dalam kajian pasca-siswazah untuk menghadapi Gelombang Ketiga, iaitu inovasi dan keusahawanan, selain meningkatkan tapak Gelombang Kedua.

Dengan cara yang perlahan tetapi pasti berjaya ini, Gelombang Keempat dan Kelima akan memastikan kita duduk sama rendah dan berdiri sama tinggi dengan Barat. Tamadun dan kreativiti tidak boleh dipaksa dan dilajukan walau pun beribu bilion ringgit dibelanjakan.

Kunci kejayaan

Memupuk sarjana muda adalah kunci kejayaan. Ahli-ahli akademik veteran perlu memastikan setiap tugasan yang diberi kepada mereka yang muda adalah tugasan yang kita sendiri mampu laksanakan jika usia kita masih muda. Dan bukan diberi kepada mereka untuk ditiru seperti cut and paste semata-mata untuk mendapatkan kenaikan pangkat kita sendiri.

Peruntukan kewangan mesti diutamakan kepada sebanyak mungkin sarjana muda dan bukannya kepada segelintir ahli akademik veteran. Kasih sayang dan rasa hormat mesti ditunjukkan kepada yang muda manakala sistem anugerah boleh-laksana perlu diwujudkan untuk memberi galakan yang sewajarnya.

Akhir sekali, apa yang paling penting adalah untuk mengajar sarjana muda bahawa tugas utama mereka dalam pembangunan bangsa (nation) adalah mendahulukan rakyat dan kepada kemanusiaan.

Usaha mereka bukan semata-mata untuk kerjaya mementingkan diri dan hidup dalam kumpulan elit, tetapi mesti berteraskan moral dan kerohanian. – Roketkini.com

Penulis adalah Profesor Jabatan Senibina, Fakulti Alam Bina, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Menanti waris Omar Mokhtar di Libya

Sunday, October 23, 2011

42 tahun menongkat langit bukan bererti akan menongkatnya terus sampai kiamat. Begitulah sekurangkurangnya hakikat yang dirasai Muamar Gadaffi. Setelah menguasai bumi Libya selama hampir setengah dekad beliau akhirnya tumpas ditumbangkan oleh rakyatnya sendiri, mati dalam keadaan ngeri yang sehingga kini jasadnya belum dikebumikan.

Apa iktibar dari semua ini?

Rakyat yang tertekan tidak akan terus membiarkan diri mereka ditekan, satu dua atau tiga empat dekad, akhirnya dengan izin Allah pasti akan bangkit jua cepat atau lambat. Apa yang berlaku di Libya bukan sesuatu yang baru. Demikianlah di negara-negara lain, Mesir dan sebelumnya Iran.

Benarlah bahawa Allah yang memberi dan meminjamkan kuasa dan Dia jugalah menarik dan merampas kembali kuasa itu atas kehendak Nya.

Cuma mungkin cara Gadaffi diperlakukan di saat-saat akhir itu rasanya agak kejam dan diluar batas syarie. Benar beliau zalim benar beliau pernah membunuh, menyiksa dan macam-macam yang buruk-buruk. Tetapi zalim bukan zalim lawannya. Satu kejahatan tidak wajar dibalas dengan kejahatan melainkan disabit dan diputuskan.

Yang menjadi kebimbangan kini adalah bagaimana Libya mahu dibina dan bangkit kembali. Yang dapat kita lihat beberapa hari sebelum Gadaffi tumbang Setiausaha Negara Amerika, Hillary Clinton telah membuat lawatan mengejut ke Libya. Apakah regim Gadaffi akan diganti dengan satu pentadbiran yang didalangi dan pro Amerika?

Rakyat Libya perlu diberi kebebasan menentukan nasib dan masa depan mereka. Semoga berkekalan begitu.

Bumi Libya ini telah menyaksikan ramai syuhada yang mati syahid menegakkan Islam. Di bumi inlah syuhada terbilang mereka, Omar Mokhtar disemadikan pada tahun 1931, bangkit memperjuangkan Islam menentang penjajah Itali sehingga syahid di tali gantung. Semoga bangkit waris-waris Omar Mokhtar menegakkan Islam di bumi Libya.

IKRAM harap polis, majikan telus pada Aziz Bari

Harakahdaily  

KUALA LUMPUR, 22 Okt: Pertubuhan Ikram Malaysia (IKRAM) sebagai sebuah pertubuhan Islam bukan kerajaan, yang memperjuangkan kecemerlangan akademik berprinsip, menyatakan kegusaran dan rasa kecewa di atas tindakan yang sedang dikenakan ke atas ahli akademik dan pakar undang-undang perlembagaan Prof Dr Abdul Aziz Bari.

Presidennya, Dr Parid Sheikh Ahmad berkata, IKRAM berpendirian bahawa kebebasan memberi pandangan adalah hak setiap rakyat Malaysia, khususnya bagi seorang ahli akademik, yang dijamin oleh Perlembagaan.

“IKRAM percaya bahawa sebagai seorang ahli akademik, Prof. Abdul Aziz berhak menyatakan pandangannya dalam bidang kepakaran beliau demi kepentingan masyarakat dan agama,” ujarnya kepada Harakahdaily.

Beliau berkata, pihaknya turut bersimpati di atas segala celaan dan tohmahan yang dilontarkan ke atas peribadi Prof. Abdul Aziz, dan sepatutnya mana-mana pihak yang tidak bersetuju dengan pandangan beliau membalas dengan hujah secra professional.

Justeru, beliau mengajak seluruh masyarakat, terutamanya para pemimpin, untuk mengambil iktibar daripada peristiwa Amirul Mukminin Khalifah Umar al-Khattab ditegur oleh seorang wanita yang bercanggah dengan hasrat Khalifah untuk menetapkan kadar mahar bagi wanita yang hendak dikahwini, dan teguran itu telah diterima oleh Khalifah dengan sikap berlapang dada.

IKRAM, ujarnya menyokong kebebasan akademik yang termaktub dalam artikel-artikel 26 dan 27 dokumen UNESCO yang bertajuk Recommedations Concerning the Status of Higher Education Teaching Personnel yang menegaskan bahawa para ahli akademik mempunyai hak untuk menyumbang kepada perubahan sosial melalui kebebasan menyatakan pendapat mereka terhadap dasar-dasar negara dan dasar-dasar yang memberi kesan kepada pendidikan tinggi dan mereka tidak seharusnya dikenakan apa-apa hukuman semata-mata kerana menggunakan hak tersebut.

Tambahnya, IKRAM berharap pihak polis dan majikan Prof. Abdul Aziz akan bertindak secara telus serta memberikan keadilan yang sewajarnya kepada beliau.

Ulasan: Nampaknya ada tangan menekan UIA supaya stafnya agar tidak bising berdasarkan kepakarannya. Siapa menang?


 

PM bermuka-muka: Puji HIMPUN, Hina BERSIH 2.0

Himpun: Najib bermuka-muka
Harakahdaily  

KUALA LUMPUR, 24 Okt: Jabatan Pilihanraya Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia membidas kenyataan ‘flip flop’ Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Datuk Seri Najib Razak yang memuji program Perhimpunan Sejuta Umat (Himpun) berjalan dengan aman dan teratur berbanding himpunan Bersih 2.0 yang lalu.

“Jabatan Pilihanraya Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia merasakan kenyataan tersebut cukup hina, berniat jahat dan menunjukkan sikap sebenar seorang Perdana Menteri yang pandai ‘bermuka-muka’ sedangkan Sekretariat Bersih 2.0 telah mengikut prosedur yang ditetapkan untuk menjayakan program tersebut dengan mematuhi saranan Yang di-Pertuan Agong,” kata pengarahnya, Mohd Sany Hamzan.

Tetapi , katanya amat malang sekali apabila pihak kerajaan dengan sewenang-wenangnya terus melabel Bersih 2.0 sebagai pertubuhan haram, menangkap penjual dan pemakai baju kuning Bersih 2.0, menggunakan pihak polis untuk memburu dan menangkap pimpinan Bersih 2.0 dan pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat, menidakkan permit himpunan walupun diarahkan untuk memohon permit, menghalang untuk menggunakan stadium walaupun Perdana Menteri berjanji untuk menyediakan kemudahan stadium kepada himpunan Bersih 2.0.

Kata beliau, sememangnya program Himpun tidak mengganggu dan mengacau mimpi pemimpin Umno dan Barisan Nasional kerana agenda aqidah umat Islam tidak menjadi agenda utama perjuangan Umno dan tidak mampu untuk menggugat kuasa pemerintahan mereka.

Ini, ujarnya berbanding agenda Bersih 2.0 yang membabitkan perjalanan pilihanraya yang telus, bersih dan adil boleh menyebabkan Umno BN akan kehilangan kuasa pemerintahan mereka selama ini yang diperolehi dengan cara yang cukup kotor, penipuan, penyalahgunaan kuasa, rasuah dan sehingga ke tahap ‘menjual maruah negara’.

“Jabatan Pilihanraya Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia menyifatkan kenyataan Datuk Seri Najib hanyalah sebagai lakonan terbaru beliau apabila melihat kegagalan Bajet 2012 diterima oleh rakyat, penolakan sepina mahkamah untuk menjadi saksi utama kes liwat II Anwar Ibrahim, kes cincin Rosmah, tekanan tehadap perbincangan Undang-undang Hudud Negeri Kelantan dan Terengganu, penghinaan terhadap institusi beraja dan pelbagai lagi isu yang menggugat kepimpinan beliau sebagai Perdana Menteri dan Presiden Barisan Nasional,” ujarnya.

Pakatan batal GST jika memerintah

Harakahdaily  

PERMATANG PAUH, 23 Okt: Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata, cukai barangan dan perkhidmatan (GST) akan tetap dibatalkan sekiranya Pakatan Rakyat berjaya memerintah negara kerana ia membebankan rakyat.

Beliau berkata demikian ketika berucap dalam majlis ramah mesra 'Sepetang Bersama Masyarakat' di Dewan Orang Ramai Batu 5, Permatang Janggus, Permatang Pauh, kelmarin.

Menurut beliau lagi, GST adalah satu bentuk paksaan yang dikenakan oleh pemerintah kepada rakyat yang sedang menghadapi masalah bebanan dengan kenaikan harga barangan.

"Sekiranya cukai ini dikenakan kepada rakyat, ia bukan saja membebankan mereka, tetapi menjadikan rakyat terpaksa tunduk kepada hasrat kerajaan untuk menekan dan menzalimi secara hormat.

"Oleh itu, seandainya PR berjaya memenangi kerusi pilihan raya umum yang akan datang, kita berjanji akan membatalkan GST yang tidak memberi manfaat kepada rakyat, khususnya golongan yang berpendapatan rendah," ujarnya yang juga ahli Parlimen Permatang Pauh.

Anwar yang juga merupakan Ahli Parlimen Permatang Pauh, turut menyelar kepimpinan Datuk Seri Najib kerana mempermainkan rakyat apabila menangguhkan GST sehingga selepas pilihan raya yang akan datang...

Ulasan: Selamat memilih calon yang berakhlak dan amanah.


Laporan Ketua Audit Negara dikeluarkan selepas 17 hari

KUALA LUMPUR: Laporan Ketua Audit Negara akhirnya dikeluarkan hari ini, selepas 17 hari Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak membentangkan Belanjawan 2012 di parlimen.

Kebiasaannya, ia diberikan kepada ahli parlimen ketika pengumuman belanjawan sepertimana terkandung dalam Peraturan Mesyuarat 20 (1), di mana Dewan Rakyat, Speaker dan ahli mesyuarat mesti dibekalkan dengan laporan itu ketika Belanjawan berlangsung.

Kelewatan ini, menimbulkan kecaman ahli-ahli parlimen Pakatan Rakyat, yang menyifatkan ia sebagai usaha untuk tidak membahaskan dan menyorokkan maklumat kandungan laporan audit berkenaan.

Sebelum ini, Belanjawan 2012 juga dibentang tanpa meneliti laporan setengah tahun perbelanjaan dan prestasi kewangan negara sepertimana kebiasaan.

Minggu lalu, Pakatan Rakyat buat pertama kalinya menubuhkan satu jawatankuasa bagi mengkaji kandungan laporan berkenaan dan punca kelewatan yang sangat ketara.

Jawatankuasa itu akan turut mengkaji dan membandingkan Laporan Ketua Audit Negara dengan laporan lain termasuk laporan Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) dan syarikat berkaitan kerajaan (GLC).

Short URL: http://www.keadilandaily.com/?p=22049

Ulasan: Begitulah hujung-hujung kerajaan yang akan pergi.


A lesson for all dictators: Gaddafi’s tragic end

Gaddafi’s tragic end 

The killing of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi last week ended his 42-year-long dictatorship in Libya, proving once again that leaders who pursue oppressive policies against their people meet their ends at the hands of those people. While voicing disapproval of the brutal killing of Gaddafi -- he was lynched by opponents -- Turkish columnists say Gaddafi’s end is nothing more than tragic and should be a lesson to all such dictators.
 
Bugün’s Nuh Gönültaş says leaders who fool their people will share the same fate as the Libyan leader and recalls the end of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and former Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak. Gönültaş regrets the fact that all these leaders who tyrannized their people were Muslims, yet he says as a Muslim he does not feel pity for these leaders’ tragic ends. “Saddams and Gaddafis are magicians and illusionists who deceive their people by using the name of God. Look, there is almost one magician or illusionist leading every Muslim nation today and they first fool Muslim people and then deceive them by using the name of God. That’s why Muslim societies are backwards today,” says Gönültaş.

Sabah’s Mahmut Övür says it is inevitable that leaders who turn a blind eye to their nation’s expectations face a tragic end as they will either end up being tried or having to flee their country in the end. Yet, regarding the case in Libya, he says the incident was violent as Gaddafi was lynched by his opponents in a brutal way, a situation that he claims undermines the values of “freedom and democracy,” which will come to the fore following Gaddafi’s end. “That dirty ground created by the ‘modern West’ is contaminating the Arab Spring, which represents the future, freedoms and democracy in the region,” says Övür.

“A tragic end and Gaddafi was killed. He did not have any peace at the time of his death just as he did not give peace to his people during his life,” says Yeni Akit’s Abdurrahman Dilipak, reflecting on the death of the Libyan leader. He says Gaddafi, who came to power in Libya at the age of 28, did not leave his position until his death at the age of 69. “He was infected with megalomania shortly after coming to power, and he established a bloody dictatorship in a short period of time. He left 42 missing years and a country in tatters behind. Children who were in primary school when Gaddafi came to power are over 50 now,” says Dilipak. In his view, it would have been better if Gaddafi had not been killed after he was captured because Dilipak thinks Gaddafi’s trial would have been more valuable than his killing.

by FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
f.zibak@todayszaman.com


217 killed, more than 1,000 injured after Turkey earthquake

23 October 2011, Sunday / TODAYSZAMAN.COM

Turkish Interior Minister İdris Naim Şahin said at least 217 killed and more than 1,000 people injured on Sunday when a powerful earthquake struck Turkey, collapsing dozens of buildings and pulling down phone and power lines in the southeast of the country, officials and witnesses said. More than 1,000 people are feared killed in the earthquake.
 
The İstanbul-based Kandilli seismology center originally reported that the magnitude was 6.6, but later corrected it to 7.2. The quake occurred at 1:41 p.m. Its epicenter was in the village of Tabanli in the eastern province of Van, bordering Iran, but the quake was also felt in the province's city center as well as the neighboring provinces of Bitlis, Muş, Batman, Diyarbakır and Hakkari. The quake struck at a depth of 5 kilometers.

Overseeing emergency operations in Erciş, one the worst hit towns, Şahin said 117 people were confirmed dead in Erciş and 100 in Van city, the provincial capital. A total of 1,090 people were known to have been injured by the quake on Sunday afternoon, he said...

Ulasan: Takziah Turki. Mari kita bantu saudara seagama kita. 


Kerajaan BN ambil berat 10 deklarasi HIMPUN?

Kerajaan ambil berat 10 deklarasi

KUALA LUMPUR 23 Okt. - Kerajaan mengambil berat 10 deklarasi yang dikemukakan oleh Himpunan Sejuta Umat (Himpun) khususnya mengenai gesaan supaya Akta Murtad diwujudkan dengan segera...

Ulasan: Nampaknya Akta Murtad jadi talian hidup UMNO menghadapi PRU13. Kita sokong penuh Akta Murtad, tetapi tidak sekali-kali menyokong UMNO. Biarlah UMNO terus membusuk sampai ke usus.


Mereka tidak layak diampun?

KUALA LUMPUR 23 Okt. – Sesiapa yang mengagungkan perjuangan komunis dan menidakkan pengorbanan serta kesetiaan anggota pasukan keselamatan dalam mempertahankan kedaulatan negara adalah pengkhianat yang dosa mereka tidak layak diampunkan.

Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak berkata, perjuangan komunis bukan untuk membebaskan negara ini daripada penjajah, sebaliknya mahu mengambil alih tanah air dan menukarnya menjadi sebuah republik sebelum mengharamkan segala kebebasan rakyat termasuk untuk beragama...

Ulasan: Perjuangan komunis sewaktu itu ialah melawan penjajah iaitu Inggeris. Jangan tidak tahu sejarah. 


NEW Libya: Liberation of Libya

NTC declares 'Liberation of Libya' 

Transitional council declares end of hostilities in conflict with Gaddafi, as NTC leader vows polls within eight months.

23 Oct 2011 19:01 

The National Transitional Council (NTC) has declared the liberation of Libya, eight-months after the uprising against Muammar Gaddafi's 42-year rule began.

Thousands of people in Kish Square in Benghazi, Libya's second city, sang the national anthem and waved flags, both of which date back to the monarchy which Gaddafi overthrew in a 1969 coup.

Mustafa Abdel Jalil, the leader of the NTC, kneeled in prayer after taking the stand in the celebration on Sunday and promised to uphold Islamic law.

"We as a Muslim nation have taken Islamic sharia as the source of legislation, therefore any law that contradicts the principles of Islam is legally nullified," Jalil told the crowd.

The NTC leader thanked the Arab League, the United Nations, and the European Union for supporting the uprising which ended with Gaddafi's death on Thursday.


"All the martyrs, the civilians and the army had waited for this moment. But now they are in the best of places ... eternal heaven," he said, shaking hands with supporters.

"The revolution began as a peaceful one. But it was faced with violence," he told the tens of thousands of Libyans gathered in the city, where fighting against Gaddafi erupted in February.

An NTC official who opened the ceremony, said: "We declare to the whole world that we have liberated our beloved country, with its cities, villages, hill-tops, mountains, deserts and skies."

Abdul Hafiz Ghoga, the council's vice-chairman, said at the ceremony that Libya would uphold all international agreements and treaties.

"The Libyan people, as they establish a state of law, firstly, assure the world of their respect for all Libya's signed agreements according to international standards," Ghoga said.

US President Barack Obama congratulated the people of Libya with what he called a "historic declaration of liberation". 

"After four decades of brutal dictatorship and eight months of deadly conflict, the Libyan people can now celebrate their freedom and the beginning of a new era of promise," a statement from Obama said. 

'Limited opportunity'

The NTC has said it will now embark on the process of building a democracy and hold the country's first free elections next year.

Libya's new leaders have a "very limited opportunity" to put aside their differences, said Mahmoud Jibril, the country's interim prime minister, as he announced he was stepping down on Saturday.

Jibril said that progress in Libya would require stronger resolution from the NTC's leaders as well as from the six million citizens of the country.

"First," he said, "What kind of resolve the NTC will show in the next few days?

"And the other thing depends mainly on the Libyan people - whether they differentiate between the past and the future."

He added: "I am counting on them to look ahead and remember the kind of agony they went through in the last 42 years."

Jibril said that the first elections for a national constituent assembly would take place "within a period of eight months"...

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/10/201110235316778897.html

Ulasan: Alhamdulillah. Mari kita doakan supaya Libya BARU adil, bebas dan telus.  Alhamdulillah. Let us pray for NEW Libya that is just, free and transparent.